Quick Answer

SMILE Pro offers faster recovery and a minimally invasive approach, while PRK is often chosen for thinner corneas or patients unsuitable for other laser procedures. The best option depends on corneal structure, lifestyle, and long-term eye health.

As Dr. Jørn Slot Jørgensen explains, the decision is not about which treatment sounds more advanced, but which one is safest and most predictable for the individual eye. Some patients are better suited to SMILE Pro because of its speed and comfort, while others may achieve their best long-term result with PRK. A detailed eye assessment is what makes that choice clear.

治療 恢复 Often Chosen When
微笑專業版 Usually faster, with many patients returning to normal routines quickly. The cornea is suitable, faster recovery is preferred, and a minimally invasive approach is appropriate.
PRK Slower surface healing, with vision improving more gradually over days to weeks. The cornea is thinner, surface treatment is safer, or preserving corneal structure is the priority.

進一步閱讀

選擇您的諮詢地點

EuroEyes Knightsbridge

EuroEyes Westfield White City

預約門診諮詢

騎士橋診所 30 分鐘諮詢


提供 0% 融資選擇

個人化的售後服務

接受私人保險

最新技術

與您的外科醫師會面

免費掃描與快速諮詢

預約門診諮詢

我們 Westfield 診所的 30 分鐘諮詢


提供 0% 融資選擇

個人化的售後服務

接受私人保險

最新技術

與您的外科醫師會面

免費掃描與快速諮詢

預約門診諮詢

在騎士橋診所只需 30 分鐘


提供 0% 融資選擇

個人化的售後服務

接受私人保險

最新技術

與您的外科醫師會面

免費掃描及 30 分鐘諮詢